It doesn’t meet your expectations? Not good, but that’s a niche use case, then. Its low market share indicates that people like other browsers more and are happy with them, so obviously, Chromium is not “bad” for the majority of people. After all, it is available for free, so anyone with an Internet-capable device who wants to use it, actually could.
If Firefox were so great, more people would use it. > Anyways, all this talk about Chromium being superior and I’m yet to see anything factual and conclusive about it other than the marketshare being higher. Each browser has strengths and weaknesses. Use what suits you best, this is literally the best recommendation anyone can give. My use case is not identical with other use cases and I never claimed such.
has custom shortcuts and other customization options). Those are not things that concern me, but if they are a concern to you, then please use something else, e.g. > Firefox is way easier to navigate (about pages, keyboard shortcuts, buttons) and just much better looking in general. I am happy with Chromium’s interface + privacy protections, so I am using Brave. I think Brave team pretty much covered all non-breaking changes one can introduce well.Īlso please understand, I think Brave is the best browser for my own use case(!), that doesn’t mean it has to be good (enough) for anyone else. You can achieve even more extreme setups with Firefox, but only by sacrificing web compatibility at the same time. There is a documentation of what they change:įor the rest that is not covered, Brave’s settings and chrome://flags suffices, as far as I’m concerned. Brave already has sane privacy settings by default, there is no need to toggle as much.
0 kommentar(er)
